Compare the programs

Summary across all candidatesMélenchon combines regulation of practice locations, more medical school places and public centres; Lisnard and Glucksmann emphasize local care and support for setting up practice. Le Pen, Lisnard, Attal and Polony also want more doctors trained. Attal targets 20,000 doctors a year and additionally deploying junior doctors in the most underserved areas: these levers can complement one another.

No proposal on this issue in the sources analyzed: Arthaud, Philippe, Retailleau, Roussel, Ruffin, Zemmour.

Summary across all candidatesMélenchon wants to guarantee access to state medical aid. Le Pen and Lisnard want to replace it with aid limited to emergencies, and Zemmour wants to abolish it.

No proposal on this issue in the sources analyzed: Arthaud, Attal, Glucksmann, Philippe, Polony, Retailleau, Roussel, Ruffin.

Summary across all candidatesLisnard and Philippe propose a 20% rise over five years; Attal announces €200 net per month and up to €500 in mid-career, and Retailleau €135 at career start up to €300 in mid-career. Glucksmann and Polony use OECD pay as a benchmark, Roussel wants to unfreeze the pay index and Le Pen to raise salaries. The aim is shared but amounts and conditions differ.

No proposal on this issue in the sources analyzed: Arthaud, Mélenchon, Ruffin, Zemmour.

Summary across all candidatesPhilippe, Attal, Roussel and Glucksmann want smaller classes. Attal targets fewer than 20 pupils by using falling pupil numbers, which Glucksmann also wants to use to improve staffing ratios. Roussel plans to recruit 90,000 teachers.

No proposal on this issue in the sources analyzed: Arthaud, Le Pen, Lisnard, Mélenchon, Polony, Retailleau, Ruffin, Zemmour.

Summary across all candidatesLisnard wants school catchment areas removed and public funding to follow parental choice; Retailleau also supports free school choice. Agreement on parental choice does not establish identical funding mechanisms or school status.

No proposal on this issue in the sources analyzed: Arthaud, Attal, Glucksmann, Le Pen, Mélenchon, Philippe, Polony, Roussel, Ruffin, Zemmour.

Summary across all candidatesLisnard and Zemmour want school heads to have more powers, including over teaching staff. Retailleau proposes 1,000 innovative public schools by 2032 and autonomy for others; Philippe also supports autonomy, without these models implying identical powers or funding.

No proposal on this issue in the sources analyzed: Arthaud, Attal, Glucksmann, Le Pen, Mélenchon, Polony, Roussel, Ruffin.

No proposal on this issue in the sources analyzed: Arthaud, Attal, Glucksmann, Le Pen, Lisnard, Mélenchon, Polony, Retailleau, Roussel, Ruffin, Zemmour.

Summary across all candidatesAttal proposes a ban for under-15s and wants a referendum on it; Zemmour opposes the ban. Retailleau proposes disabling certain addictive features for minors, which does not explicitly answer whether access should be banned for under-15s.

No proposal on this issue in the sources analyzed: Arthaud, Glucksmann, Le Pen, Lisnard, Mélenchon, Philippe, Polony, Retailleau, Roussel, Ruffin.

Summary across all candidatesMélenchon and Roussel want selection or Parcoursup removed; Glucksmann wants a replacement platform and Le Pen transparent criteria. Attal supports reducing mass enrollment, Zemmour entrance exams and quotas for courses with poor job prospects, and Retailleau transparent merit-based selection: support for stronger selection does not imply identical mechanisms.

No proposal on this issue in the sources analyzed: Arthaud, Lisnard, Philippe, Polony, Ruffin.

Summary across all candidatesPhilippe wants higher fees actually applied to non-European students; Zemmour wants free study ended for foreign students. Retailleau also proposes higher contributions: agreement on higher fees does not establish a common rate or nationality scope.

No proposal on this issue in the sources analyzed: Arthaud, Attal, Glucksmann, Le Pen, Lisnard, Mélenchon, Polony, Roussel, Ruffin.